Comparing Mutual Fund and Exchange-Traded Fund
The mutual fund market is not new thing in the investment. The mutual fund is a professionally managed type of collective investment that pools money from many investors to buy stocks, bonds, short-term money market instruments, and/or other securities. Funds that are maintained by the same fund manager and that have the same brand name are known as a “fund family” or “fund complex”.
On the other hand, Exchange-Traded Fund is an investment fund traded on stock exchanges, much like stocks. Moreover, an ETF holds assets such as stocks, commodities, or bonds, and trades close to its net asset value over the course of the trading day. The ETFs may be attractive as investments because of their low costs, tax efficiency, and stock-like features.
The traditional mutual fund industry and ETF proponents are wooing the investment dollars. However, the investors do not rush into a relationship without comparing the competition. Across a crowded room, index funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are pretty good lookers and both have low costs, diversification, and approval from Mom and Dad. But it’s what’s on the inside that counts. So let’s take a deeper look at these two worthy contenders for investment dollars by this mutual fund and ETF comparisons.
In traditional way, actively managed mutual funds usually begin with a load of cash and a fund management team. The investors send their C-notes to the fund, are issued shares, and the Porsche piloting team of investment managers figures out what to buy. Then, some of these stock pickers are very good at this, but the other 80% of them, not so much. The index mutual funds work similarly to traditional ones except that the managers ride the bus and eat sack lunches. It is more important if index mutual funds put money into stocks that as a whole track a chosen benchmark. If the fund is popular or its salesmen make it so, then it attracts gobs of money. The more money that comes in, the more shares must be created, and the more stocks investment, the managers must go out and buy for the fund.
Besides, ETFs work almost in reverse. They begin with an idea and are born of stocks instead of money. Major investing institutions, such as Fidelity Investments or the Vanguard Group already control billions of shares. Then, to create an ETF, they simply peel a few million shares off the top of the pile, putting together a basket of stocks to represent the appropriate index, say, the Nasdaq composite or the TBOPP index we made up for the kick-off article. Moreover, they deposit the shares with a holder and receive a number of creation units in return. In effect they are trading stocks for creation units, or buying their way into the fund using equities instead of money.
A creation unit is a large block, perhaps 50,000 shares, of the ETF and these creation units are then split up by the recipients into the individual shares that are traded on the market. More creation units and also more market shares can be made if institutional investors deposit more shares into the underlying hopper. It is same as the pool of outstanding ETF shares which can be dried up if one of the fat cats swaps back creation units for underlying shares in the basket.
The variation in the fund structures mean subtle, but important differences at the end of the chain for individual investors.
Entries (RSS)